USDA Forest ServiceSkip navigational links    

Pacific Southwest Research Station

 Pacific Southwest
Research Station
 About Us
 Contact Us
 FAQs
 Management Plans
 Newsroom
 Publications & Products
 Researchers & Cooperators
 Studies

Research Topics

 Air Quality
 Ecosystem Processes
 Fire Science
 Insects & Disease
 Recreation
 Urban Forestry
 Vegetation Management
 Water & Watersheds
 Wildlife & Fish

Programs & Projects

Research Centers

Evaluate Our Service

Pacific Southwest Research Station
800 Buchanan Street
West Annex Building
Albany, CA 94710-0011

(510) 559-6300

San Dimas Experimental Forest

SDEF Home Page | Williams Fire |Fire Severity | Water Quality | Water Yield | Ecology | Lysimeters | Resources & Maps | Photos |Management Plan | Site description, Facilities, and Use | The Future of San Dimas

Table I. Fluxes of water, nitrate, and ammonium and volume-weighted NO3- concentration in stream water during the hydrologic year beginning 1 October 1984.

 

NO3- flux a

                 

NH4+ flux a

                

 

Watershed

 

 

 

Area

Water yield

annual

high b flow

annual

high flow

NO3-

concentration

no.

Treatment

(ha)

(cm)

(eq/ha)

(meq/L)

West Fork of San Dimas Canyon

773

unburned

40.5

2.1

38. d

0.

1.0

0.

0.18 d

776

moderate fire

34.9

4.4 c

108.

39.

7.3

4.9

0.25

775

severe fire

14.9

18. c

870.

510.

124.

113.

0.48

Bell Canyon

803

unburned

25.1

1.6

23.

0.

1.4

0.

0.14

804

moderate fire

15.9

7.6

230.

190.

3.9

2.1

0.30

874

severe fire

16.2

32.

1590.

770.

143.

105.

0.50

 

a Estimates reported here for annual flux in each watershed reflect a 1 L/s minimum detection limit set by performance of the trapezoidal flumes calibrated for low flow. For comparison, computed NO3- flux at flow rates to a 0.02 L/s minimum was 26 eq/ha from watershed no. 803 and 240 eq/ha from no. 804. NH4+ flux at all flow rates was 2.7 eq/ha from no. 803 and 5.1 eq/ha from no. 804.
b Discharge during debris-laden flows, estimated as flows at rates >40 L/s; no flows of this magnitude occurred on the unburned watersheds.
c Approximate standard errors for these annual water yield estimates, computed by a Monte Carlo simulation based on errors in the high- and low-flow calibration functions, duration of the 19 December debris flow, and peak-flow sediment concentration, were 5.4% of the point estimate for watershed no. 775 and 13% of the estimate for no. 776.
d Annual NO3- flux and concentration estimates shown here for watershed no. 773 were weighted by a ratio (2.6:1) of mean prefire concentrations between watersheds 773 and 776 as measured during peak and recessional flows of 1983. This provides an estimate of performance by watershed 776 during 1984 had it not burned. Concentrations in no. 773 were consistently higher than those from watersheds further east in West Fork San Dimas Canyon, possibly as a result of greater exposure to onshore winds and elevated deposition of air pollutants rising from the Los Angeles Basin. The watersheds in Bell Canyon did not substantially differ prior to treatment.

Disclaimers | Privacy Notice | Web Manager

Last Modified: October 14, 2004